Courts Bill [HL] — 8 May 2003 at 12:26

Baroness Hanham voted with the majority (Content).

[Amendment No. 6 not moved.]

Clause 4 [Establishment of court administration councils]:

[Amendments Nos. 7 to 17 not moved.]

moved Amendment No. 18:

Leave out Clause 4 and insert the following new Clause-

"ESTABLISHMENT OF COURTS BOARDS

(1) England and Wales is to be divided into areas for each of which there is to be a courts board.

(2) The areas are to be those specified by an order made by the Lord Chancellor.

(3) Each area established by an order under subsection (2) is to be known by such name as is specified in the order (but subject to subsection (4)).

(4) The Lord Chancellor may make orders altering the areas.

(5) "Altering", in relation to an area, includes (as well as changing its boundaries)-

(a) combining it with one or more other areas,

(b) dividing it between two or more other areas, and

(c) changing its name.

(6) Before making an order under subsection (4), the Lord Chancellor must consult any courts board affected by the proposed order.

(7) Schedule (Constitution and procedure of courts boards) contains provisions about the constitution and procedure of courts boards."

On Question, amendment agreed to.

[Amendment No. 19, as an amendment to Amendment No. 18, not moved.]

Clause 5 [Role of court administration councils]:

moved Amendment No. 20:

Leave out Clause 5 and insert the following new Clause-

"FUNCTIONS OF COURTS BOARDS

(1) Each courts board is under a duty, in accordance with guidance under this section-

(a) to scrutinise, review and make recommendations about the way in which the Lord Chancellor is discharging his general duty in relation to the courts with which the board is concerned, and

(b) for the purposes mentioned in paragraph (a), to consider draft and final business plans relating to those courts.

(2) In discharging his general duty in relation to the courts, the Lord Chancellor must give due consideration to recommendations provided by the boards under subsection (1).

(3) The courts with which a courts board is concerned are-

(a) the Crown Court,

(b) county courts, and

(c) magistrates' courts,

in the board's area.

(4) The Lord Chancellor must prepare and issue the boards with guidance about how they should carry out their functions under subsection (1).

(5) The guidance may in particular contain provisions-

(a) about the procedures to be followed in connection with draft and final business plans;

(b) conferring on the boards functions supplementing their functions under subsection (1).

(6) The Lord Chancellor may from time to time issue the boards with revised guidance and revoke previous guidance.

(7) Guidance issued under this section must be laid before both Houses of Parliament."

On Question, amendment agreed to.

[Amendment No. 21, as an amendment to Amendment No. 20, not moved.]

moved, as an amendment to Amendment No. 20, Amendment No. 22:

Line 12, at end insert-

"(2A) If the Lord Chancellor rejects a recommendation made by a courts board about a final business plan under subsection (1) he shall give to the board written reasons for so doing."

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 22) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 98; Not-Contents, 83.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Con63 (+1 tell) 029.9%
Green1 0100.0%
Lab0 78 (+2 tell)41.9%
LDem19 (+1 tell) 030.8%
UUP1 033.3%
Crossbench12 38.9%
Total:96 8128.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive