Courts Bill [HL] — 8 May 2003 at 18:53

Baroness Rendell of Babergh voted with the majority (Not-Content).

moved Amendment No. 106:

Page 22, line 23, at end insert "; and

(c) the procedure to be followed by court security staff in the discharge of their functions"

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 106) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 40; Not-Contents, 72.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con0 23 (+2 tell)11.5%
Crossbench1 21.7%
Lab69 (+2 tell) 036.8%
LDem0 1218.5%
Total:70 3717.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Alton of LiverpoolCrossbenchno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive