Finance Bill — Clause 139 — Employee Securities and Options — 14 May 2003 at 16:30
Jeremy Corbyn MP, Islington North voted with the majority (No).
I beg to move amendment No. 12.
Clause 139, which gives effect to new schedule 22, takes up some 80 pages of the Bill-
Question put, That the amendment be made:-
The Committee divided: Ayes 172, Noes 289.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 127 (+2 tell) | 0 | 79.1% |
DUP | 0 | 2 | 0 | 40.0% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent Conservative | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 282 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 69.3% |
LDem | 0 | 38 | 0 | 71.7% |
PC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 50.0% |
SNP | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
UUP | 0 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
Total: | 289 | 172 | 0 | 71.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |