Planning and Compulsory Purchase Bill (Carry-Over) — 10 Jun 2003 at 13:55
Liam Fox MP, Woodspring voted in the minority (No).
I beg to move,
That if at the conclusion of this Session of Parliament proceedings on the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Bill have not been completed, they shall be resumed in the next Session.
It being one and a half hours after the commencement of proceedings on the motion, Madam Deputy Speaker put the Question, pursuant to Order [29 October 2002].
The House divided: Ayes 279, Noes 162.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 112 (+2 tell) | 0 | 69.9% |
DUP | 0 | 2 | 0 | 40.0% |
Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 276 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 67.8% |
LDem | 0 | 37 | 0 | 69.8% |
PC | 0 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
SNP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 100.0% |
UUP | 1 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
Total: | 278 | 162 | 0 | 68.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote |
Sylvia Hermon | North Down | UUP (front bench) | aye |