Licensing Bill [Lords] — Schedule 1 — Provision Of Regulated Entertainment — 16 Jun 2003 at 20:43
Oliver Letwin MP, West Dorset did not vote.
Question accordingly negatived.
Amendment proposed: No. 63, in page 112, line 18, at end insert-
'Small events-live music
(1) The provision of entertainment consisting of the performance of live music is not to be regarded as the provision of regulated entertainment for the purposes of this Act where-
(a) the number of listeners or spectators present does not exceed 200 at any one time, and
(b) the entertainment ceases no later than 11.30 pm.
(2) The provision of entertainment facilities solely for the purposes of entertainment described in subparagraph (1) is not to be regarded as the provision of regulated entertainment for the purposes of this Act.
(3) Nothing in this paragraph shall be read as rendering invalid or otherwise affecting any provision of, or any regulation made under, any other legislation that applies to the entertainment, the entertainment facilities or the premises on which the entertainment is to take place.'.-[Mr. Moss.]
Question put, That the amendment be made:-
The House divided: Ayes 146, Noes 284.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||110 (+2 tell)||0||68.7%|
|Lab||295 (+2 tell)||1||0||72.7%|
|Paul Murphy||Torfaen||Lab (minister)||aye|