[S2M-154.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 18 Jun 2003 at 17:03
This looks like the vote on S2M-154.2
The description in the bulletin on 2003-06-18 is:
*S2M-154.2 Mr David Davidson: Patient Focus and Public Involvement in the NHS—As an amendment to motion (S2M-154) in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, leave out from "welcomes" to end and insert "regrets that the Scottish Executive’s proposal in Partnership for Care: Scotland’s Health White Paper and A Partnership for a Better Scotland, in an attempt to increase patient focus and public involvement, will only increase bureaucracy in an over-centralised NHS and considers measures such as GP fundholding and foundation hospitals would offer patients real choice regarding their own care, would focus on clinical priorities over political priorities, and would, therefore, start to solve the real problems facing the health service."
You can search for this motion (S2M-154.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that amendment S2M-154.2, in the name of David Davidson, which seeks to amend motion S2M-154, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, on patient focus and public involvement in the NHS, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 17 | 0 | 94.4% |
Green | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% |
Lab | 48 | 0 | 0 | 96.0% |
LDem | 14 | 0 | 0 | 82.4% |
SNP | 22 | 0 | 0 | 84.6% |
SSCUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSP | 4 | 0 | 0 | 66.7% |
Total: | 97 | 17 | 0 | 89.1% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by constituency
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |