Commons Amendment — 19 Jun 2003 at 13:35
Baroness Masham of Ilton voted with the majority (Content).
62 Page 112, line 31, leave out paragraph 12
rose to move, as an amendment to the Motion that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 62, leave out the words from "that" to the end and insert "the House do disagree with the Commons in their amendment but do propose the following amendment in lieu thereof"- Page 112, line 30, at end insert-
"Small events: live music
(1) The provision of entertainment consisting of the performance of live music is not to be regarded as the provision of regulated entertainment for the purposes of this Act where-
(a) the number of listeners or spectators present does not exceed 200 at any one time, and
(b) the entertainment ceases no later than 11.30pm. (2) The provision of entertainment facilities solely for the purposes of entertainment described in sub-paragraph (1) is not to be regarded as the provision of regulated entertainment for the purposes of this Act.(2) Nothing in this paragraph shall be read as rendering invalid or otherwise affecting any provision of, or any regulation made under, any other legislation that applies to the entertainment, the entertainment facilities or the premises on which the entertainment is to take place."
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 62A) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 128; Not-Contents, 113.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Content)||Minority (Not-Content)||Turnout|
|Con||74 (+2 tell)||1||36.3%|
|Lab||0||103 (+2 tell)||55.9%|
|Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville||Con (front bench)||no|
|Baroness Howarth of Breckland||Crossbench||no|
|Baroness O'Neill of Bengarve||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Avebury||LDem (front bench)||no|