Commons Amendment — 19 Jun 2003 at 13:35

Baroness Rendell of Babergh voted in the minority (Not-Content).

62 Page 112, line 31, leave out paragraph 12

rose to move, as an amendment to the Motion that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 62, leave out the words from "that" to the end and insert "the House do disagree with the Commons in their amendment but do propose the following amendment in lieu thereof"- Page 112, line 30, at end insert-

"Small events: live music
(1) The provision of entertainment consisting of the performance of live music is not to be regarded as the provision of regulated entertainment for the purposes of this Act where-

(a) the number of listeners or spectators present does not exceed 200 at any one time, and

(b) the entertainment ceases no later than 11.30pm. (2) The provision of entertainment facilities solely for the purposes of entertainment described in sub-paragraph (1) is not to be regarded as the provision of regulated entertainment for the purposes of this Act.(2) Nothing in this paragraph shall be read as rendering invalid or otherwise affecting any provision of, or any regulation made under, any other legislation that applies to the entertainment, the entertainment facilities or the premises on which the entertainment is to take place."

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 62A) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 128; Not-Contents, 113.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Con74 (+2 tell) 135.8%
Crossbench17 613.5%
Green1 0100.0%
Lab0 102 (+2 tell)53.6%
LDem34 153.8%
Total:126 11037.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Brooke of Sutton MandevilleCon (front bench)no
Lord Chorley Crossbenchno
Baroness Howarth of BrecklandCrossbenchno
Lord Hylton Crossbenchno
Lord Kilclooney Crossbenchno
Lord Marsh Crossbenchno
Baroness O'Neill of BengarveCrossbenchno
Lord Avebury LDem (front bench)no

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive