Communications Bill — 23 Jun 2003 at 17:50

Baroness Rendell of Babergh voted with the majority (Not-Content).

moved Amendment No. 4:

Page 3, line 29, at end insert-

"( ) the application, in the case of electronic communications network services, of standards that provide adequate protection to members of the public and all other persons from unwarranted infringements of privacy resulting from activities carried on for the purposes of such services;"

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 4) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 99; Not-Contents, 160.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Bishop2 08.3%
Con0 78 (+2 tell)37.2%
Crossbench4 1611.7%
Independent Labour0 1100.0%
Independent Socialist1 0100.0%
Lab117 (+2 tell) 061.3%
LDem33 152.3%
Total:157 9638.3%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Baroness Boothroyd Crossbenchno
Baroness Howarth of BrecklandCrossbenchno
Lord Moser Crossbenchno
Lord Roll of IpsdenCrossbenchno
Baroness Nicholson of WinterbourneLDemaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive