Anti-social Behaviour Bill — third reading— — 24 Jun 2003 at 19:33
Oliver Letwin MP, West Dorset voted with the majority (Aye).
I beg to move, That the Bill be now read the Third time.
I want to thank not only my hon. Friends on the Front Bench for their sterling efforts today, but my hon. Friend the Member for Coventry, North-East (Mr. Ainsworth) and his colleagues who saw the Bill through Committee. I commend Members of all parties who served on the Committee for the extremely vigorous way in which the Bill was dealt with, especially by my own Back-Benchers who think that I am not going far enough. I should like them to write an article in The Independent newspaper explaining why I am not tough and courageous enough in dealing with these issues, which would undoubtedly change my image enormously overnight with its readers. I shall be brief, as I realise that the Third Reading debate is truncated owing to the very serious statement that has to be made afterwards, and I want other hon. Members to be able to take part.
Question put, That the Bill be now read the Third time:-
The House divided: Ayes 419, Noes 43.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Independent Ulster Unionist||1||0||0||33.3%|
|Lab||292 (+2 tell)||0||0||71.9%|
|LDem||0||39 (+2 tell)||0||77.4%|