Criminal Justice Bill — 15 Sep 2003 at 19:54

Lord Higgins was absent

Clause 91 [Abolition of common law rules]:

On Question, Whether Clause 91 shall stand part of the Bill?

On Question, Whether Clause 91 shall stand part of the Bill?

*Their Lordships divided: Contents, 83; Not-Contents, 36.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop0 417.4%
Con0 52.4%
Crossbench2 75.3%
Lab80 243.9%
LDem0 1726.6%
Total:82 3517.8%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

The Earl of ErrollCrossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Skidelsky Crossbenchaye
Baroness Kennedy of The ShawsLabno
Lord Wedderburn of CharltonLabno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive