Lords Amendment — 17 Sep 2003 at 16:01
Lord Rogers of Riverside was absent
3 Clause 11, page 5, line 32, leave out paragraph (b) The Commons disagree to this amendment for the following reason-
3A Because it would alter the financial arrangements made by the Commons, and the Commons do not offer any further reason, trusting that this reason may be deemed sufficient.
rose to move, as an amendment to the Motion that the House do not insist on their Amendment No. 3 to which the Commons have disagreed for their reason numbered 3A, leave out from "disagreed" to end and insert ", but do propose the following amendment in lieu thereof"-
3Bpage 5, line 33, leave out from "receipt" to end and insert "to be used by the receiving authority in accordance with directions by the Secretary of State"
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 3B) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 139; Not-Contents, 118.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
| Con | 88 (+1 tell) | 0 | 42.0% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ind Lab | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 0 | 102 (+2 tell) | 54.7% |
| LDem | 39 (+1 tell) | 0 | 62.5% |
| Other | 0 | 1 | 7.1% |
| UUP | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Crossbench | 7 | 13 | 11.8% |
| Total: | 137 | 116 | 39.3% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
| Name | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | |||