Iraq — Set up of judicial inquiry — rejected — 22 Oct 2003 at 18:40
Adrian Bailey MP, West Bromwich West voted with the majority (No).
The majority of MPs voted against the motion:
- This House
- is concerned at growing public confusion since the summer adjournment as a result of increasingly conflicting accounts of intelligence relating to and events leading up to the recent Iraq war and what has happened since; and
- calls for the setting up of a comprehensive independent judicial inquiry into the Government's handling of the run-up to the war, of the war itself, and of its aftermath, and into the legal advice which it received.
An alternative motion was proposed in its place and voted through immediately afterwards.
- Michael Ancram MP, House of Commons, 22 October 2003
- Division 336, House of Commons, 22 October 2003
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||135 (+2 tell)||0||84.0%|
|Independent Ulster Unionist||0||3||0||100.0%|
|Lab||302 (+2 tell)||0||0||74.3%|