Hunting Bill: amendment — hare coursing — 28 Oct 2003 at 19:49
Lord Christopher was absent
A vote on whether to support Clause 5 of the Hunting Bill, which contained a ban on hare coursing from the Hunting Bill, or to allow for (permitted) "registered" coursing.
Those voting content were voting to retain the ban; those voting non-content supported registered hare coursing.
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 59; Not-Contents, 129.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Not-Content)||Minority (Content)||Turnout|
|Con||84 (+2 tell)||2||41.7%|
|Lab||8||42 (+2 tell)||28.0%|
|Baroness Fookes||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Viscount Colville of Culross||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Viscount Craigavon||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Brooks of Tremorfa||Lab||no|
|Lord Donoughue||Lab (minister)||no|
|Lord Howie of Troon||Lab (minister)||no|
|Baroness Mallalieu||Lab (minister)||no|
|Lord Randall of St Budeaux||Lab||no|
|Lord Temple-Morris||Lab (minister)||no|
|Lord Carlile of Berriew||LDem||no|
|Viscount Falkland||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Lord Mackie of Benshie||LDem||no|
|Lord Sharman||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Lord Taverne||LDem (front bench)||no|