Hunting Bill: amendment — tests for registration — 28 Oct 2003 at 22:44
The Earl of Lindsay was absent
An amendment to define tests of "utility" and "least suffering" which would given when hunting with dogs would be "registered" (and hence permitted) rather than banned.
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 106; Not-Contents, 22.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
Con | 69 (+1 tell) | 1 | 33.2% |
Crossbench | 20 | 0 | 11.7% |
Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 5 (+1 tell) | 17 (+2 tell) | 13.0% |
LDem | 8 | 1 | 14.1% |
Total: | 103 | 19 | 19.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Baroness Fookes | Con (front bench) | no |
Lord Bragg | Lab | aye |
Lord Brennan | Lab (minister) | aye |
Lord Donoughue | Lab (minister) | aye |
Lord Howie of Troon | Lab | aye |
Baroness Mallalieu | Lab (minister) | tellaye |
Lord Randall of St Budeaux | Lab | aye |
Baroness Harris of Richmond | LDem (front bench) | no |