Hunting Bill: procedural motion — 28 Oct 2003 at 23:04

was absent

A vote to cease the day's consideration of the Hunting Bill in the light of advice from Giovernment whips that no more time would be allowed for debate on the Bill.

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 74; Not-Contents, 34.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Con49 1128.4%
Crossbench12 28.3%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Lab5 18 (+2 tell)13.2%
LDem5 (+2 tell) 010.9%
UUP0 133.3%
Total:72 3217.0%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Blatch Conno
Brooke of Sutton MandevilleConno
Fookes Conno
Hurd of WestwellConno
King of BridgwaterConno
Mayhew of TwysdenConno
Miller of HendonConno
Moynihan Conno
Renton of Mount HarryConno
The of SelborneConno
Skelmersdale Conno
Warnock Crossbenchno
Williamson of HortonCrossbenchno
Donoughue Labaye
Howie of TroonLabaye
Kirkhill Labaye
Mallalieu Labaye
Randall of St BudeauxLabaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive