Criminal Justice Bill (Programme) — 18 Nov 2003 at 14:02
Mr Anthony Steen MP, Totnes voted in the minority (No).
Motion made, and Question put forthwith, pursuant to Orders [28 June 2001 and 29 October 2002],
That the following proceedings shall apply to the Criminal Justice Bill for the purpose of supplementing the Orders of 4th December 2002 and 2nd April 2003:
Consideration of Lords Amendments
1. Proceedings on consideration of Lords Amendments shall (so far as not previously concluded) be brought to a conclusion six hours after their commencement at this day's sitting.
2. Those proceedings shall be taken in the order shown in the first column of the following Table, and each part of those proceedings shall (so far as not previously concluded) be brought to a conclusion at the time shown in the second column.
3. Any further Message from the Lords may be considered forthwith without any further Question put.
4. The proceedings on any further Message from the Lords shall (so far as not previously concluded) be brought to a conclusion one hour after their commencement.-<[i>Gillian Merron.]
The House divided: Ayes 343, Noes 181.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||126 (+2 tell)||0||78.5%|
|Lab||343 (+2 tell)||0||0||84.6%|