Lords Amendment — Criminal Justice Bill — Juries and fraud trials — 19 Nov 2003 at 16:16
Lord Nickson voted in the minority (Not-Content).
32 Clause 41, Leave out Clause 41 The Commons disagree to this Amendment for the following reason-
32A Because it should be possible for a defendant to apply for a trial to be conducted without a jury.
rose to move, as an amendment to the Motion that the House do not insist on its Amendment No. 32 to which the Commons have disagreed for their reason numbered 32A, leave out "not".
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 32B) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 196; Not-Contents, 125.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
|Party||Majority (Content)||Minority (Not-Content)||Turnout|
|Con||116 (+1 tell)||1||55.9%|
|Lab||1||111 (+2 tell)||61.3%|
|LDem||53 (+1 tell)||0||84.4%|
|Viscount Colville of Culross||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Baroness Finlay of Llandaff||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Baroness Howarth of Breckland||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Weatherill||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Baroness Mallalieu||Lab (minister)||aye|