Lords Amendment — Criminal Justice Bill — Juries and fraud trials — 19 Nov 2003 at 16:16
Viscount Falkland voted with the majority (Content).
32 Clause 41, Leave out Clause 41 The Commons disagree to this Amendment for the following reason-
32A Because it should be possible for a defendant to apply for a trial to be conducted without a jury.
rose to move, as an amendment to the Motion that the House do not insist on its Amendment No. 32 to which the Commons have disagreed for their reason numbered 32A, leave out "not".
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 32B) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 196; Not-Contents, 125.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
| Con | 117 (+1 tell) | 1 | 56.4% |
| Green | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ind Lab | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 1 | 111 (+2 tell) | 60.3% |
| LDem | 53 (+1 tell) | 0 | 84.4% |
| UUP | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Crossbench | 19 | 11 | 17.8% |
| Total: | 194 | 123 | 50.3% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
| Name | Party | Vote |
| Lord Renton | Con | no |
| Baroness Mallalieu | Lab | aye |