Lords Amendment — Criminal Justice Bill — Juries and fraud trials  — 19 Nov 2003 at 16:30
Baroness Kennedy of The Shaws voted with the majority (Content).
33Leave out Clause 42
The Commons disagree to this amendment but propose the following amendments to the words so restored to the Bill-
33A Clause 42, page 28, line 34, after "where" insert "(a)"
33B Page 28, line 35, at end insert "and
(b) notice has been given under section 51B of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 (notices in serious or complex fraud cases) in respect of that offence or those offences."
33C Page 28, line 39, leave out "both of the following conditions are" and insert "the following condition is"
33D Page 28, line 42, leave out "The first" and insert "That"
33E Page 29, line 3, leave out subsection (5)
33F Page 29, line 9, leave out "both of those conditions are" and insert "that condition is"
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 33G) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 197; Not-Contents, 125.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Content)||Minority (Not-Content)||Turnout|
|Con||116 (+1 tell)||2||56.4%|
|Lab||2||110 (+2 tell)||61.3%|
|LDem||54 (+1 tell)||0||85.9%|
|Lord Lawson of Blaby||Con||no|
|Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market||Con (front bench)||no|
|Viscount Colville of Culross||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Baroness Darcy de Knayth||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Donaldson of Lymington||Crossbench||no|
|Baroness Finlay of Llandaff||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Baroness Howarth of Breckland||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Roll of Ipsden||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Weatherill||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Baroness Kennedy of The Shaws||Lab||aye|
|Baroness Mallalieu||Lab (minister)||aye|