Lords Amendment — Criminal Justice Bill — Juries and fraud trials — 20 Nov 2003 at 13:31

Baroness Blackstone voted in the minority (Not-Content).

32 Clause 41, Leave out Clause 41 The Commons disagree to this amendment for the following reason-

32A Because it should be possible for a defendant to apply for a trial to be conducted without a jury. The Lords insist on their amendment to which the Commons have disagreed, for the following reason-

32B Because it is inappropriate to make provision for applications by the defendant for trials to be conducted without jury. The Commons insist on their disagreement to this amendment but propose the following amendment to the words so restored to the Bill-

32C Page 27, line 40, leave out "must" and insert "may"

rose to move, as an amendment to the Motion that the House do not insist on its Amendment No. 32, and do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 32C, leave out from "House" to end and insert "do insist on its Amendment No. 32, and do propose Amendments Nos. 32E to 32L as consequential amendments to the Bill"-

32EClause 41, page 29, line 40, leave out paragraph (a)

32FPage 30, line 19, leave out "41"

32GPage 30, line 40, leave out "41"

32HPage 31, line 25, leave out "41"

32IPage 32, line 9, leave out "41"

32JPage 33, line 6, leave out paragraph (a)

32KPage 33, line 33, leave out "41"

32LPage 33, line 41, leave out "41"

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 32D) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 163; Not-Contents, 115.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop2 07.7%
Con92 (+1 tell) 044.1%
Ind Lab1 0100.0%
Lab2 94 (+2 tell)51.9%
LDem52 (+1 tell) 082.8%
Other1 08.3%
UUP1 033.3%
Crossbench10 1917.2%
Total:161 11341.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Baroness Kennedy of The ShawsLabaye
Baroness Mallalieu Labaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive