[S2M-838] Decision Time — 12 Feb 2004 at 17:05

This looks like the vote on S2M-838

The description in the bulletin on 2004-01-30 is:

*S2M-838 Cathy Jamieson: Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, etc.) Bill - UK Legislation-That the Parliament endorses the principle of creating a new offence to combat trafficking in human beings for non-sexual exploitation as set out in the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, etc.) Bill and agrees that the provisions to achieve this end in Scotland which relate to devolved matters should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Hugh Henry*

The description in the bulletin on 2004-02-02 is:

S2M-838 Cathy Jamieson: Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, etc.) Bill - UK Legislation-That the Parliament endorses the principle of creating a new offence to combat trafficking in human beings for non-sexual exploitation as set out in the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, etc.) Bill and agrees that the provisions to achieve this end in Scotland which relate to devolved matters should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Hugh Henry

The description in the bulletin on 2004-02-09 is:

S2M-838 Cathy Jamieson: Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, etc.) Bill - UK Legislation-That the Parliament endorses the principle of creating a new offence to combat trafficking in human beings for non-sexual exploitation as set out in the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, etc.) Bill and agrees that the provisions to achieve this end in Scotland which relate to devolved matters should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Hugh Henry

You can search for this motion (S2M-838) on TheyWorkForYou

Text Introducing Division:

The second question is, that motion S2M-838, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, etc) Bill, UK legislation, be agreed to. Are we agreed?

No.

There will be a division.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |