[S2M-944.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 26 Feb 2004 at 17:00
This looks like the vote on S2M-944.2
The description in the bulletin on 2004-02-26 is:
*S2M-944.2 Shona Robison: Building and Supporting NHS Workforce-As an amendment to motion (S2M-944) in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, leave out from "recognises" to end and insert "is concerned that consultant, nurse and allied health professional vacancies are at an all-time high and that these healthcare workforce shortages are resulting in the ad-hoc and arbitrary centralisation of services across Scotland without adequate public consultation and often to the detriment of patient care, and therefore urges the Scottish Executive to carry out a national review of service planning and redesign in order to ensure equality of access to acute and primary care services in all parts of Scotland."
You can search for this motion (S2M-944.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S2M-944.2, in the name of Shona Robison, which seeks to amend motion S2M-944, in the name of Malcolm Chisholm, on building and supporting the national health service work force, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 17 | 0 | 0 | 94.4% |
Green | 0 | 7 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 45 | 0 | 0 | 90.0% |
LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
SNP | 0 | 26 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSCUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSP | 0 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 78 | 43 | 0 | 94.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by constituency
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |