Planning and Compulsory Purchase Bill — 1 Mar 2004 at 17:04
Baroness Maddock voted with the majority (Teller for the Contents).
Clause 36 [Regulations]:
[Amendment No. 107 not moved.]
Clause 38 [Development plan]:
moved Amendment No. 108:
Page 20, line 28, at end insert-
"( ) For the purposes of any area in Greater London, the development plan prior to the publication by the Mayor of London of a new spatial development strategy in accordance with section 341(1)(b) of the Greater London Authority Act 1999 (c. 29) (alteration or replacement) is the unitary development plan adopted in accordance with the principal Act."
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 108) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 137; Not-Contents, 131.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Content)||Minority (Not-Content)||Turnout|
|Lab||0||114 (+2 tell)||63.4%|
|LDem||34 (+2 tell)||0||56.3%|
|Viscount Craigavon||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Craig of Radley||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Baroness Masham of Ilton||Crossbench||aye|
|Lady Saltoun of Abernethy||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Thomas of Swynnerton||Crossbench||aye|