[S2M-1050.4 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 18 Mar 2004 at 17:02
Dr Jean Turner MP, Strathkelvin and Bearsden voted in the minority (No).
This looks like the vote on S2M-1050.4
The description in the bulletin on 2004-03-18 is:
*S2M-1050.4 Tavish Scott: Abolition of Council Tax-As an amendment to motion (S2M-1050) in the name of Fergus Ewing, leave out from "believes" to end and insert "agrees that the forthcoming independent review of local government finance should be asked to conduct a thorough examination of a range of local taxation systems, including the various proposals for an income-based system and reforms to the present council tax system, and encourages all those who wish to make a meaningful contribution to the review to submit their proposals when called upon to do so." Supported by: Mr Andy Kerr*
You can search for this motion (S2M-1050.4) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The third question is, that amendment S2M-1050.4, in the name of Tavish Scott, which seeks to amend motion S2M-1050, in the name of Fergus Ewing, on abolition of the council tax, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
| Con | 16 | 0 | 0 | 88.9% |
| Green | 0 | 0 | 7 | 100.0% |
| Independent | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 46 | 0 | 0 | 92.0% |
| LDem | 15 | 0 | 0 | 88.2% |
| SNP | 0 | 26 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSCUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SSP | 0 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 77 | 36 | 7 | 93.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||