Planning and Compulsory Purchase Bill (Programme) (No. 2) — 19 Apr 2004 at 14:30
Patrick McLoughlin MP, West Derbyshire voted in the minority (No).
Motion made, and Question put forthwith, pursuant to Orders [28 June 2001 and 6 November 2003],
That the following provisions shall apply to the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Bill for the purpose of supplementing the Orders of 17th December 2002, 8th September 2003 and 8th December 2003;
Consideration of Lords Amendments
1. Proceedings on Consideration of Lords Amendments shall be completed at today's sitting.
2. Proceedings shall be taken in the order shown in the following Table.
3. The proceedings shown in the first column of the Table shall (so far as not previously concluded) be brought to a conclusion at the time specified in the second column.
4. Any further Message from the Lords may be considered forthwith without any Question put.
5. Proceedings on any further Message from the Lords shall (so far as not previously concluded) be brought to a conclusion one hour after their commencement-<[i>Keith Hill.]
The House divided: Ayes 260, Noes 149.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||115 (+2 tell)||0||71.8%|
|Lab||260 (+2 tell)||0||0||64.2%|