Lords Amendment — 26 Apr 2004 at 16:12
Baroness Ludford voted with the majority (Content).
3 Page 1, line 11, at end insert-
"(3A) The RSS must include sub-regional plans for all parts of the region in accordance with geographical boundaries defined by the RPB.
(3B) The sub-regional plans referred to in subsection (3A) shall be prepared by the authorities falling within section 4(1) if their area or any part of their area is in the defined sub-region." The Commons disagree to this amendment for the following reason-
3A Because it is not appropriate to create more than one tier of regional spatial strategy.
rose to move Amendment No. 3B, as an amendment to the Motion that the House do not insist on its Amendment No. 3 to which the Commons have disagreed for their reason numbered 3A, leave out "not".
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 3B) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 132; Not-Contents, 116.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
Bishop | 0 | 1 | 3.8% |
Con | 84 (+2 tell) | 0 | 40.6% |
Crossbench | 8 | 8 | 9.5% |
Green | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent Socialist | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Lab | 0 | 103 (+2 tell) | 56.5% |
LDem | 35 | 0 | 55.6% |
Total: | 129 | 113 | 37.3% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |