Lords Amendment — 26 Apr 2004 at 17:06

Lord Bassam of Brighton voted with the majority (Teller for the Not-Contents).

21 Clause 22, page 13, line 15, leave out "(other than a development plan document)"

The Commons disagree to this amendment for the following reason-

21A Because it is not consistent with measures to speed up the plan making process.

rose to move Amendment No. 21B, as an amendment to the Motion that this House do not insist on its Amendment No. 21 to which the Commons have disagreed for their reason numbered 21A, leave out "not".

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 21B) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 92; Not-Contents, 125.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con0 4923.6%
Green0 1100.0%
Lab114 (+2 tell) 062.7%
LDem0 35 (+2 tell)58.7%
Other1 010.0%
Crossbench8 57.8%
Total:123 9034.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive