Lords Amendment — 11 May 2004 at 14:30

Lord Laming voted with the majority (Not-Content).

1 Before Clause 1, insert the following new Clause-

"Application of Part 1

Part 1 shall apply only if an elected assembly for the region has been established."

The Commons disagree to this amendment for the following reason-

1A Because it is not appropriate to restrict the application of a regional spatial strategy only to regions which have elected assemblies.

The Lords insist on their Amendment No. 1 to which the Commons have disagreed, for the following reason-

1B Because responsibility for drawing up regional spatial strategies should lie with the elected representatives of the communities affected.

The Commons insist on their disagreement to Lords Amendment No. 1 but propose the following amendment to the Bill in lieu thereof-

1C Page 2, line 7, at end insert-

'(2A) The Secretary of State must not give a direction under subsection (1) in relation to a body unless not less than 60% of the persons who are members of the body fall within subsection (2B).

(2B) A person falls within this subsection if he is a member of any of the following councils or authorities and any part of the area of the council or authority (as the case may be) falls within the region to which the direction (if given) will relate-

(a) a district council;

(b) a county council;

(c) a metropolitan district council;

(d) a National Park authority;

(e) the Broads authority.'

rose to move Amendment No. 1D, as an amendment to the Motion that this House do not insist on its Amendment No. 1, in respect of which the Commons have insisted on their disagreement, but do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 1C in lieu thereof, leave out from "House" to end and insert "do insist on its Amendment No. 1, and do disagree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 1C in lieu thereof".

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 1D) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 44; Not-Contents, 141.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con1 11.0%
Lab112 (+2 tell) 061.6%
LDem0 38 (+2 tell)63.5%
Other2 020.0%
UUP1 033.3%
Crossbench23 315.6%
Total:139 4229.1%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive