Health Protection Agency Bill [Lords] (Programme) — 21 Jun 2004 at 19:58
Andrew Murrison MP, Westbury voted in the minority (No).
The Aye-voters set a timetable for Standing Committee F to review the Health Protection Agency Bill and complete it by Thursday 1st July 2004.
The Bill would then be returned back to the House of Commons for a report and third reading before being sent to the House of Lords, after which it would pass into law.
There had been no vote to accept this piece of legislation during the previous debate, so the only scope for objection was against this time-tabling vote.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 36 (+2 tell) | 0 | 23.3% |
Lab | 210 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 52.1% |
LDem | 19 | 0 | 0 | 35.2% |
SNP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 20.0% |
Total: | 230 | 36 | 0 | 42.9% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |