Health Protection Agency Bill [Lords] (Programme) — 21 Jun 2004 at 19:58

Oliver Letwin MP, West Dorset did not vote.

The Aye-voters set a timetable for Standing Committee F to review the Health Protection Agency Bill and complete it by Thursday 1st July 2004.

The Bill would then be returned back to the House of Commons for a report and third reading before being sent to the House of Lords, after which it would pass into law.

There had been no vote to accept this piece of legislation during the previous debate, so the only scope for objection was against this time-tabling vote.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Con0 36 (+2 tell)023.3%
Lab210 (+2 tell) 0052.1%
LDem19 0035.2%
SNP1 0020.0%
Total:230 36042.9%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive