Hunting Bill (Procedure) — 15 Sep 2004 at 15:10
John Barrett MP, Edinburgh West voted with the majority (No).
Aye voters supported an amendment to the procedure motion in order to allow MPs other than Government Ministers to propose amendments to the Bill immediately after its passage by the Commons. This would have allowed MPs to suggest to the House of Lords that the Parliament Act to be used to pass a different Bill to that passed by the House of Commons the previous session.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||127 (+2 tell)||0||79.1%|
|Lab||281 (+2 tell)||3||0||70.4%|
|Kate Hoey||Vauxhall||Lab (minister)||aye|
|Austin Mitchell||Great Grimsby||Lab (minister)||aye|
|Barry Sheerman||Huddersfield||Lab (minister)||aye|
|Richard Allan||Sheffield, Hallam||LDem (front bench)||no|
|John Barrett||Edinburgh West||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Tom Brake||Carshalton and Wallington||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Paul Burstow||Sutton and Cheam||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Alistair Carmichael||Orkney and Shetland||LDem (front bench)||no|
|David Chidgey||Eastleigh||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Edward Davey||Kingston and Surbiton||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Andrew George||St Ives||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Mike Hancock||Portsmouth South||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Paul Holmes||Chesterfield||LDem (front bench)||no|
|David Rendel||Newbury||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Bob Russell||Colchester||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Adrian Sanders||Torbay||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Andrew Stunell||Hazel Grove||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Jenny Tonge||Richmond Park||LDem||no|