Hunting Bill: amendment — hare coursing — 26 Oct 2004 at 14:30
Baroness Gould of Potternewton voted in the minority (Teller for the Not-Contents).
An amendment to remove the ban on hare coursing from the Hunting Bill.
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 67; Not-Contents, 54.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
Con | 49 | 1 | 23.7% |
Crossbench | 12 | 2 | 7.9% |
Lab | 3 (+2 tell) | 28 (+2 tell) | 17.1% |
LDem | 0 | 20 | 29.0% |
Total: | 64 | 51 | 17.9% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Baroness Fookes | Con (front bench) | no |
The Countess of Mar | Crossbench | no |
Lord Williamson of Horton | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Donoughue | Lab | tellaye |
Baroness Golding | Lab | tellaye |
Lord Hogg of Cumbernauld | Lab | aye |
Baroness Mallalieu | Lab (minister) | aye |
Viscount Simon | Lab (minister) | aye |