Carry-over of Bills — 26 Oct 2004 at 18:31
Gwyneth Dunwoody MP, Crewe and Nantwich voted in the minority (No).
Motion made, and Question put,
That, with effect from the beginning of the next Session of Parliament, the Order of the House of 29th October 2002 relating to Carry-over of Bills be a Standing Order of the House, with the following amendments:
(1) After paragraph (4), insert-
'(4A) A carry-over motion may be made only in respect of a bill presented by a Minister of the Crown.
(4B) The provisions of this order shall not apply to a carry-over motion made in respect of a bill brought from the Lords.'
(2) In paragraph (8)(a), after 'committed', insert 'to a standing committee', and leave out from first 'Session' to end of the sub-paragraph.
(3) After paragraph (9) insert-
'(9A) A programme order relating to a bill which is carried over to the next session of Parliament shall continue to apply in the next session.'.-[Mr. Woolas.]
The House divided: Ayes 296, Noes 137.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||111 (+2 tell)||0||69.3%|
|Lab||263 (+2 tell)||5||0||66.3%|
|Gwyneth Dunwoody||Crewe and Nantwich||Lab (minister)||no|
|Frank Field||Birkenhead||Lab (minister)||no|
|Kate Hoey||Vauxhall||Lab (minister)||no|
|Kelvin Hopkins||Luton North||Lab (minister)||no|
|Austin Mitchell||Great Grimsby||Lab (minister)||no|
|David Heath||Somerton and Frome||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Simon Hughes||North Southwark and Bermondsey||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Lembit Öpik||Montgomeryshire||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Robert Smith||West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine||LDem (front bench)||no|