Hunting Bill: amendment — hunting to protect sheep in a National Park — 27 Oct 2004 at 14:30
Baroness Chalker of Wallasey voted with the majority (Not-Content).
An amendment to the Hunting Bill to permit hunting with dogs for the control of foxes for the purpose of protecting sheep on a fell or moorland within a sheep grazing area in a designated National Park.
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 36; Not-Contents, 81.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Not-Content)||Minority (Content)||Turnout|
|Con||31 (+2 tell)||18 (+1 tell)||25.0%|
|Lab||25||2 (+1 tell)||13.9%|
|The Earl of Arran||Con||aye|
|Earl Attlee||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Baroness Buscombe||Con (front bench)||aye|
|The Earl of Dundee||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Glentoran||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Hurd of Westwell||Con||aye|
|Lord Jopling||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Mayhew of Twysden||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Baroness Park of Monmouth||Con||aye|
|Baroness Rawlings||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Roberts of Conwy||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Sanderson of Bowden||Con||aye|
|Lord Skelmersdale||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Vinson||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Viscount Colville of Culross||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Greenway||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Greaves||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Baroness Harris of Richmond||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Lord Phillips of Sudbury||LDem (front bench)||no|
|Lord Roberts of Llandudno||LDem||no|