New Clause 10 — Victims of persons subject to hospital order with restriction order: representations — New Clause 6 — Duration of occupation orders — 27 Oct 2004 at 15:15

David Drew MP, Stroud voted with the majority (No).

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Question put, That the amendment be made:-

The House divided: Ayes 176, Noes 297.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Con0 123 (+1 tell)076.1%
DUP0 60100.0%
Independent0 1050.0%
Lab297 (+2 tell) 0073.5%
LDem0 40 (+1 tell)074.5%
PC0 3075.0%
UUP0 3060.0%
Total:297 176074.3%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive