Children Bill [Lords] — New Clause 5 — Presumption of equal parenting — 2 Nov 2004 at 15:52
Chris McCafferty MP, Calder Valley voted with the majority (No).
I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.
The purpose of the new clause is to amend the Children Act 1989 to provide a subsidiary measure to that in section 1 of the Act dealing with the child's welfare being of paramount consideration, so as to make it absolutely clear that the intention-[Interruption.]
Question put, That the clause be read a Second time:-
The House divided: Ayes 176, Noes 304.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 126 (+2 tell) | 0 | 78.5% |
DUP | 0 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
Lab | 301 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 74.4% |
LDem | 0 | 44 | 0 | 80.0% |
PC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 75.0% |
UUP | 0 | 3 | 0 | 60.0% |
Total: | 304 | 176 | 0 | 75.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |