[S2M-1925.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 3 Nov 2004 at 17:10
Dr Jean Turner MP, Strathkelvin and Bearsden abstained
This looks like the vote on S2M-1925.1
The description in the bulletin on 2004-11-03 is:
*S2M-1925.1 Lord James Douglas-Hamilton: Ambitious, Excellent Schools—As an amendment to motion (S2M-1925) in the name of Peter Peacock, leave out from "supports" to end and insert "acknowledges the Scottish Executive’s agenda described in Ambitious, Excellent Schools; recognises, however, that, in order to achieve its aim of promoting ambition and encouraging excellence, schools must be granted greater autonomy and that public funds must be allowed to follow the pupil to any school of the parents’ choosing so that parents can exercise genuine choice between schools and not just within schools, encouraging the expansion of popular schools and the upgrading of unsuccessful schools."
You can search for this motion (S2M-1925.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that amendment S2M-1925.1, in the name of Lord James Douglas-Hamilton, which seeks to amend motion S2M-1925, in the name of Peter Peacock, on ambitious, excellent schools, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 18 | 0 | 100.0% |
Green | 6 | 0 | 0 | 85.7% |
Independent | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
Lab | 47 | 0 | 0 | 94.0% |
LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
SNP | 23 | 0 | 0 | 92.0% |
SSCUP | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
SSP | 2 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% |
Total: | 95 | 18 | 2 | 89.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |