Pensions Bill — 8 Nov 2004 at 14:30

Baroness Rendell of Babergh voted in the minority (Not-Content).

moved Amendment No. 261:

Page 235, line 25, at end insert-

"( ) Payments made under this section shall be made to eligible scheme members regardless of their other income or capital."

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 261) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 139; Not-Contents, 117.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Con85 (+1 tell) 041.0%
Crossbench12 27.9%
Independent Socialist0 1100.0%
Lab0 110 (+2 tell)54.6%
LDem38 (+1 tell) 158.0%
Total:135 11438.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Hannay of ChiswickCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Ouseley Crossbenchno
Lord Dahrendorf LDemno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive