Civil Contingencies Bill — 9 Nov 2004 at 17:05

Lord Quinton voted with the majority (Content).

<[i>Amendments Nos. 24 to 28 not moved.]

Clause 7 <[i>Urgency]:

moved Amendment No. 29:

Page 7, line 16, leave out "a Minister of the Crown thinks that"

On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 29) shall be agreed to?

Their Lordships divided: Contents, 142; Not-Contents, 127.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Con86 (+2 tell) 042.5%
Crossbench20 212.6%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Lab0 123 (+2 tell)61.9%
LDem31 044.9%
UUP1 0100.0%
Total:139 12540.9%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

Baroness Finlay of LlandaffCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Weatherill Crossbench (front bench)no

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive