Pensions Bill — 15 Nov 2004 at 17:46
Baroness Gale voted with the majority (Not-Content).
<[i>Amendment No. 67 not moved.]
moved Amendment No. 68:
Page 242, line 8, leave out "such period as may be prescribed" and insert "the prescribed period ending immediately before the day appointed under section 127(2)"
On Question, amendment agreed to.
moved Amendment No. 69:
Page 242, line 22, at end insert-
"( ) Schemes where the qualifying pension scheme was wound up while the sponsoring employer was solvent shall be qualifying pension schemes for the purpose of this section"
On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 69) shall be agreed to?
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 64; Not-Contents, 134.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Not-Content) | Minority (Content) | Turnout |
Con | 1 | 7 | 3.8% |
Crossbench | 5 | 7 | 6.8% |
Green | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Independent Socialist | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 124 (+2 tell) | 0 | 61.5% |
LDem | 0 | 47 (+2 tell) | 71.0% |
Total: | 131 | 62 | 29.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Lamont of Lerwick | Con | no |
Lord Chan | Crossbench | no |
Baroness D'Souza | Crossbench | no |
Baroness Darcy de Knayth | Crossbench | no |
Lord Hylton | Crossbench | no |
Lord St John of Bletso | Crossbench | no |