Hunting Bill (Procedure) (No.2) — 16 Nov 2004 at 18:15

Alistair Darling MP, Edinburgh Central voted with the majority (Aye).

Motion made, and Question put forthwith, pursuant to Order [15 September],

That the Order of 15th September shall be supplemented as follows-
1. At this day's sitting proceedings on consideration of Lords amendments shall be brought to a conclusion (unless already concluded) three hours after commencement of proceedings on the motion relating to Hunting Bill (Money).
2. For the purpose of bringing proceedings on consideration of Lords Amendments to a conclusion in accordance with paragraph 1 the Speaker shall put the following questions forthwith (and no others)-
(1) any question which has been proposed from the Chair and has not yet been decided,
(2) the question on any motion moved by a Minister of the Crown to disagree with Lords Amendments (which may, in particular, be a motion relating to a specified group of amendments),
(3) the question on any motion moved by a Minister of the Crown for an amendment in lieu, and
(4) the question on any other motion moved by a Minister of the Crown.
3. Sessional Orders F(7) and H (Programming of Bills: ancillary questions and Reasons Committee) of 28th June 2001 shall apply to proceedings in relation to the Hunting Bill.
4. Paragraph 6(1) to (7) of the Order of 15th September shall apply to proceedings on consideration of Lords Amendments.
5. No notice shall be required of a further motion to supplement the Order of 15th September.-[Jim Fitzpatrick.]

The House divided: Ayes 310, Noes 179.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Con1 129 (+2 tell)081.0%
DUP0 5083.3%
Independent0 1050.0%
Independent Conservative0 10100.0%
Lab299 (+2 tell) 0074.0%
LDem10 36083.6%
PC0 3075.0%
UUP0 4080.0%
Total:310 179076.7%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
Ann WiddecombeMaidstone and The WealdCon (front bench)aye
Tom BrakeCarshalton and WallingtonLDem (front bench)aye
Paul BurstowSutton and CheamLDem (front bench)aye
Vincent CableTwickenhamLDem (front bench)aye
Alistair CarmichaelOrkney and ShetlandLDem (front bench)aye
Mike HancockPortsmouth SouthLDem (front bench)aye
Paul HolmesChesterfieldLDem (front bench)aye
Charles KennedyRoss, Skye and Inverness WestLDem (front bench)aye
John PughSouthportLDem (front bench)aye
Sarah TeatherBrent EastLDemaye
Steve WebbNorthavonLDem (front bench)aye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive