Hunting Bill — Lords Amendment — 17 Nov 2004 at 19:57
Lord Faulkner of Worcester voted in the minority (Teller for the Not-Contents).
A vote to insist on the previous Lords version of the Hunting Bill (ie registered hunting) in place of the Commons amendment of a ban on hunting with dogs.
This was the second round of Parliamentary "ping-pong".
Their Lordships divided: Contents, 188; Not-Contents, 79.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
Bishop | 3 | 1 | 15.4% |
Con | 112 (+1 tell) | 1 | 54.3% |
Crossbench | 30 | 2 | 18.1% |
Green | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 17 (+1 tell) | 59 (+2 tell) | 38.5% |
LDem | 17 | 11 | 40.6% |
Total: | 181 | 74 | 37.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division