[S2M-1960.1 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 18 Nov 2004 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S2M-1960.1
The description in the bulletin on 2004-11-17 is:
*S2M-1960.1 Miss Annabel Goldie: The Fire (Scotland) Bill—As an amendment to motion (S2M-1960) in the name of Cathy Jamieson, insert at end "but, in so doing, seeks assurances from the Scottish Executive that the ministerial powers in part 1 of the Bill will not be used to amalgamate existing fire boards in Scotland."
You can search for this motion (S2M-1960.1) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The second question is, that amendment S2M-1960.1, in the name of Annabel Goldie, which seeks to amend motion S2M-1960, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on the general principles of the Fire (Scotland) Bill, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 14 | 0 | 77.8% |
Green | 6 | 0 | 0 | 85.7% |
Independent | 1 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
Lab | 46 | 0 | 0 | 93.9% |
LDem | 17 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
SNP | 0 | 24 | 0 | 96.0% |
SSCUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
SSP | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 76 | 41 | 0 | 91.4% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |