Constitutional Reform Bill — Clause 2 — Requirement of membership of the House of Lords — 31 Jan 2005 at 21:00

Mr Ian Taylor MP, Esher and Walton voted in the minority (Aye).

Those voting No deleted Clause 2 of the Constitutional Reform Bill, which said:

No person is qualified to be Lord Chancellor unless he is a member of the House of Lords.

The Lord Chancellor's functions are outlined in this Bill

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Con0 114 (+2 tell)071.6%
DUP0 4057.1%
Lab254 (+2 tell) 0062.7%
LDem17 0030.9%
PC1 0025.0%
UUP0 1020.0%
Total:272 119061.6%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive