Constitutional Reform Bill [Lords] — [2nd Allotted Day] — Clause 105 — Removal from most senior judicial offices — 1 Feb 2005 at 16:45

Mr Charles Hendry MP, Wealden voted in the minority (No).

I beg to move amendment No. 3, in clause 105, page 46, leave out from end of line 17 to 'unless' in line 19 and insert

'or, if the Lord Chancellor is not a member of that House, by another Minister of the Crown at his request.

Question put, That the clause, as amended, stand part of the Bill:-

The Committee divided: Ayes 277, Noes 162.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Con0 116 (+2 tell)072.8%
DUP0 3042.9%
Ind0 1050.0%
Lab277 (+2 tell) 0068.4%
LDem0 36065.5%
PC0 2050.0%
UUP0 4080.0%
Total:277 162068.9%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive