Constitutional Reform Bill [Lords] — [2nd Allotted Day] — Clause 105 — Removal from most senior judicial offices — 1 Feb 2005 at 16:45
Dominic Grieve MP, Beaconsfield voted in the minority (No).
I beg to move amendment No. 3, in clause 105, page 46, leave out from end of line 17 to 'unless' in line 19 and insert
'or, if the Lord Chancellor is not a member of that House, by another Minister of the Crown at his request.
Question put, That the clause, as amended, stand part of the Bill:-
The Committee divided: Ayes 277, Noes 162.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||116 (+2 tell)||0||72.8%|
|Lab||277 (+2 tell)||0||0||68.4%|