[S2M-2242] Decision Time — 3 Feb 2005 at 17:04

This looks like the vote on S2M-2242

The description in the bulletin on 2005-01-13 is:

*S2M-2242 Cathy Jamieson: Inquiries Bill - UK Legislation—That the Parliament recognises the benefits of a modern statutory framework for the holding of inquiries into matters of public concern and agrees that the provisions in the Inquiries Bill, so far as they relate to matters within the legislative competence of the Parliament or to the executive competence of the Scottish Ministers, should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Hugh Henry*

The description in the bulletin on 2005-01-17 is:

S2M-2242 Cathy Jamieson: Inquiries Bill - UK Legislation—That the Parliament recognises the benefits of a modern statutory framework for the holding of inquiries into matters of public concern and agrees that the provisions in the Inquiries Bill, so far as they relate to matters within the legislative competence of the Parliament or to the executive competence of the Scottish Ministers, should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Hugh Henry

The description in the bulletin on 2005-01-31 is:

S2M-2242 Cathy Jamieson: Inquiries Bill - UK Legislation—That the Parliament recognises the benefits of a modern statutory framework for the holding of inquiries into matters of public concern and agrees that the provisions in the Inquiries Bill, so far as they relate to matters within the legislative competence of the Parliament or to the executive competence of the Scottish Ministers, should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Hugh Henry

You can search for this motion (S2M-2242) on TheyWorkForYou

Text Introducing Division:

The next question is, that motion S2M-2242, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on the Inquiries Bill, which is UK legislation, be agreed to. Are we agreed?

No.

There will be a division.

Debate in Parliament | Historical Hansard | Source |