Serious Organised Crime and Police Bill — Timetable — Third reading — 3 Feb 2005 at 14:43
Kenneth Clarke MP, Rushcliffe voted in the minority (No).
The Aye-voters set a detailed timetable for the final review of the Serious Organised Crime and Police Bill
The full debate, which happened on 7 February 2005, was scheduled to last six and a half hours.
Changes to the Bill relating to racial and religious hatred were to be considered for one and a half hours. Changes relating to the use of intercept evidence in legal proceedings, one hour. Changes relating to the protection of organisations from economic damage or other interference with their activities, another hour. Changes relating to the status and powers of staff of the Serious Organised Crime Agency, another hour. And changes relating to behaviour in vicinity of Parliament Square, the next hour.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||0||96 (+2 tell)||0||60.9%|
|Lab||254 (+2 tell)||0||0||62.7%|