[S2M-2330] Decision Time — 23 Feb 2005 at 17:05
Campbell Martin MP, West of Scotland did not vote.
This looks like the vote on S2M-2330
The description in the bulletin on 2005-01-27 is:
* S2M-2330 Cathy Jamieson:International Organisations Bill - UK Legislation—That the Parliament recognises the need for the United Kingdom to implement the international obligations for which the International Organisations Bill makes provision, and agrees that those provisions in the Bill that fall within the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament and have the effect of conferring functions on the Scottish ministers should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Hugh Henry*
The description in the bulletin on 2005-01-31 is:
S2M-2330 Cathy Jamieson: International Organisations Bill - UK Legislation—That the Parliament recognises the need for the United Kingdom to implement the international obligations for which the International Organisations Bill makes provision, and agrees that those provisions in the Bill that fall within the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament and have the effect of conferring functions on the Scottish ministers should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Hugh Henry
The description in the bulletin on 2005-02-21 is:
S2M-2330 Cathy Jamieson: International Organisations Bill - UK Legislation—That the Parliament recognises the need for the United Kingdom to implement the international obligations for which the International Organisations Bill makes provision, and agrees that those provisions in the Bill that fall within the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament and have the effect of conferring functions on the Scottish ministers should be considered by the UK Parliament. Supported by: Hugh Henry
You can search for this motion (S2M-2330) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The third question is, that motion S2M-2330, in the name of Cathy Jamieson, on the International Organisations Bill, which is United Kingdom legislation, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 14 | 0 | 0 | 77.8% |
Green | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 0 | 2 | 40.0% |
Lab | 44 | 0 | 0 | 89.8% |
LDem | 16 | 0 | 0 | 94.1% |
SNP | 21 | 0 | 0 | 84.0% |
SSP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 83.3% |
Total: | 102 | 5 | 2 | 85.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |